Photoelectric Effect: A 3-Step Check for MHT-CET Numericals
The photoelectric effect is the emission of electrons from a metal when light of high enough frequency hits it. Frequency sets electron energy; intensity only sets how many come out.
By Rahul Jeewani, Founder · Updated 24 Oct 2026

Key takeaways
The photoelectric effect obeys one equation, K_max = hf − φ. Frequency decides the energy of each electron; intensity decides only the number of electrons, and so the current.
- Solve every numerical in three steps: convert the wavelength to energy in eV, compare it with the work function φ, then subtract. If the photon energy is smaller than φ, nothing is emitted and the question ends there.
Doubling the frequency does not double the kinetic energy. For sodium, halving the wavelength from 400 nm to 200 nm raises K_max from 0.64 eV to 3.74 eV, about 5.8 times.
- Graphs hide the constants. On a stopping potential against frequency graph, the slope is h/e and the x-intercept is the threshold frequency.
In this article
- 1What is the photoelectric effect, and what does Einstein's equation say?
- 2How do you solve a photoelectric effect numerical in three steps?
- 3What are the threshold wavelengths for common metals?
- 4Why does brighter light not give faster electrons?
- 5What happens to kinetic energy when the frequency doubles?
- 6How do you read the three photoelectric graphs?
- 7How should you practise the photoelectric effect for MHT-CET?
- 8Frequently asked questions
Many photoelectric effect questions are built to make a wrong instinct feel right. Brighter light feels as if it should give faster electrons. Doubling the frequency feels as if it should double the energy. Both instincts are wrong.
Einstein's equation, K_max = hf − φ, settles every such question, but only if you use it in the right order. Here φ is the work function, the minimum energy needed to free an electron, and energies are easiest in electron-volts (eV), where 1 eV is the energy an electron gains across 1 volt. We recommend converting the light to eV first, comparing it with φ, and only then calculating.
This page gives you that three-step check, a lookup table of threshold wavelengths for five metals, and the three graphs you need to read. It is written for Class 12 and MHT-CET (Maharashtra Common Entrance Test) students, though the physics is the same everywhere.
In Class 12 this sits in the chapter Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter, which both the Maharashtra HSC board and MHT-CET test.
What is the photoelectric effect, and what does Einstein's equation say?
The photoelectric effect is the ejection of electrons from a metal surface by light. Light arrives as photons, each carrying energy E = hf. One photon gives its energy to one electron. The electron spends φ (the work function, the minimum energy needed to leave the metal) and keeps the rest as kinetic energy: K_max = hf − φ.
The word "max" matters. Electrons that sit deeper in the metal lose some energy on the way out, so hf − φ is the most any electron can have.
Three observations broke the wave theory of light, and the OpenStax University Physics textbook lists them:
- There is no time lag, even at very low intensity.
- The maximum kinetic energy does not depend on intensity.
- Below a cut-off frequency (the threshold frequency f₀, where hf₀ = φ) nothing is emitted.
Heinrich Hertz first noticed the effect in 1887. Philipp Lenard found in 1902 that electron energy did not depend on intensity. Einstein explained everything with photons in 1905 (Wikipedia: Photoelectric effect), and received the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect (Nobel Prize: Physics 1921).
In the Class 12 syllabus this sits in the chapter on Dual Nature of Radiation and Matter. Our MHT-CET physics syllabus checklist shows where it sits in your revision order.
How do you solve a photoelectric effect numerical in three steps?
Solve it by converting the light to energy in electron-volts (eV), comparing that with φ, and only then subtracting. This order stops you wasting time on questions where no electron is emitted at all. One electron-volt is the energy an electron gains across a potential difference of 1 volt.
Step 1: Convert to eV. Use E = 1240 / λ, with λ in nanometres. The shortcut comes from hc = 1240 eV·nm (OpenStax). If the question gives frequency, use E = hf with the values it gives.
Pass: you have a photon energy in eV. Fail: you are carrying joules and 10⁻¹⁹ into the next step for no reason.
Step 2: Compare with φ. If E is smaller than φ, write "no photoelectrons" and stop. Equivalently, if λ is longer than the threshold wavelength λ₀ = 1240 / φ, nothing comes out.
Pass: E ≥ φ, so you continue. Fail: E < φ and you calculated a negative kinetic energy anyway.
Step 3: Subtract. K_max = E − φ in eV. The stopping potential V₀ (the reverse voltage that just stops the fastest electrons) is the same number in volts, because eV₀ = K_max.
Pass: K_max is positive and V₀ in volts equals K_max in eV. Fail: you wrote V₀ in joules, or you subtracted φ from a K_max you had already computed.
What are the threshold wavelengths for common metals?
For sodium, aluminium, copper, silver and platinum the threshold wavelengths are 504, 304, 264, 262 and 195 nm. Light with a longer wavelength than λ₀ = 1240 / φ ejects no electrons from that metal.
Work functions are from OpenStax; λ₀ = 1240 / φ is our calculation from the OpenStax values, rounded to the nearest nanometre:

| Metal | Work function φ (eV) | Threshold wavelength λ₀ (nm) |
|---|---|---|
| Sodium (Na) | 2.46 | 504 |
| Aluminium (Al) | 4.08 | 304 |
| Copper (Cu) | 4.70 | 264 |
| Silver (Ag) | 4.73 | 262 |
| Platinum (Pt) | 6.35 | 195 |
Worked example. Light of 200 nm falls on silver. E = 1240 / 200 = 6.20 eV. This is above φ = 4.73 eV, so electrons are emitted. K_max = 6.20 − 4.73 = 1.47 eV, and V₀ = 1.47 V. The same silver surface under 300 nm light gives E = 4.13 eV, which is below 4.73 eV, so there is no emission.
Why does brighter light not give faster electrons?
Brighter light gives more photons per second, not more energetic ones, so it increases the number of electrons and the current but leaves K_max unchanged. Each electron is hit by a single photon, and the energy of that photon depends only on frequency.
This also answers the other common doubt: why does very bright light below the threshold frequency eject nothing? A wave could in theory pile up energy over time. A photon cannot be pooled with others. If one photon has less energy than φ, a thousand of them still fail, one at a time. Emission above threshold is also effectively instant, in under 10⁻⁹ s (Wikipedia).
Use this table when a question changes one thing:

| What you change | Saturation current | Stopping potential V₀ | K_max | Emission? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intensity up (same f, above f₀) | Rises in proportion | Same | Same | Yes |
| Frequency up (same intensity) | Falls, because the same power gives fewer photons per second as each photon carries more energy | Rises | Rises | Yes |
| Frequency below f₀ | Zero | None | None | No, at any intensity |
| Different metal (larger φ) | May drop to zero | Falls | Falls | Only if E ≥ φ |
The saturation current is the plateau the photocurrent reaches once every emitted electron is collected. If a question holds the number of photons per second constant instead of the intensity, the saturation current stays the same when the frequency changes.
What happens to kinetic energy when the frequency doubles?
K_max does not double when the frequency doubles, because φ is subtracted from the photon energy, not from K_max. Take sodium (φ = 2.46 eV) with 400 nm light. E = 3.10 eV, so K_max = 3.10 − 2.46 = 0.64 eV. Double the frequency by halving the wavelength to 200 nm. E = 6.20 eV, so K_max = 6.20 − 2.46 = 3.74 eV. The ratio is 3.74 / 0.64 ≈ 5.8.
Only when φ is negligible would doubling the frequency double K_max. This is the trap to expect in a "frequency doubled, KE becomes…" option set. Always redo E − φ.
How do you read the three photoelectric graphs?
Read each graph by turning it back into K_max = hf − φ, then matching slope and intercepts. Because eV₀ = hf − φ, V₀ = (h/e)f − φ/e.
| Graph | Slope | Intercepts |
|---|---|---|
K_max against f | h | x-intercept f₀; y-intercept −φ |
| V₀ against f | h/e | x-intercept f₀; y-intercept −φ/e |
| Photocurrent against voltage | Not a straight line | Curves for different intensities (same f) reach different plateaus but cut the voltage axis at the same V₀; a higher f cuts at a more negative V₀ |
Two practical points:
- Two metals give parallel straight lines on a K_max–f or V₀–f graph. Parallel lines mean the same slope (h or h/e), so the same constant, and different φ.
- To find h from two readings (V₁ at f₁, V₂ at f₂), use h = e(V₂ − V₁) / (f₂ − f₁). The work function cancels out.
How should you practise the photoelectric effect for MHT-CET?
Practise it by repeating the three-step check on mixed problems until you stop reaching for the formula before the comparison. We recommend practising the intensity-versus-frequency trap, the doubled-frequency trap and the graph slope question first, because each one tests a different step of the check.
- Use our checked PYQ library to find previous-year questions on this chapter, and write down which of the three traps each one tests.
- The general method behind Step 1 to Step 3 is in How to Solve Physics Numericals: 4 Steps for HSC and MHT-CET.
- Keep the formulas for the whole of Class 12 in one place with our HSC physics formula sheet.
If you want this taught live, with recordings, notes, previous-year questions and mock tests, RG Sir (Rahul Jewaani) teaches our MHTCET 2027 Long Term Batch. It covers the complete Physics and Chemistry syllabus, and costs ₹1,632 as of October 2026 (listed from ₹1,999). Physics Padhna Aasaan Hai, but it needs regular practice.
Learn MHT-CET Physics live with RG Sir
Frequently asked questions
The stopping potential is V₀ = (hf − φ) / e. It follows from eV₀ = K_max = hf − φ. In eV, V₀ in volts has the same number as K_max.
Take the slope of the straight line. On a stopping potential against frequency graph the slope is h/e, so h = e × slope. On a K_max against frequency graph the slope is h itself.
Yes, for exam purposes. Emission takes place in less than 10⁻⁹ s after the light strikes the surface (Wikipedia). There is no build-up delay, even at very low intensity, which is one of the observations the wave theory could not explain.
Yes, when wavelengths are in nanometres and you want energy in eV. It gives E = 1240 / λ directly (OpenStax). If a question gives specific values of h and c, use those, since rounding may differ slightly.


